Dating the writing of the gospels
The supposition that the author was one and the same with the beloved disciple is often advanced as a means of insuring that the evangelist did witness Jesus' ministry.
Two other passages are advanced as evidence of the same - and . does not claim that the author was the one who witnessed the scene but only that the scene is related on the sound basis of eyewitness.
70 CE] both brothers had 'drunk the cup' that Jesus had drunk and had been 'baptized with the baptism' with which he had been baptized." Since the patristic tradition is unanimous in identifying the beloved disciple with John, at least this evidence discredits the patristic tradition concerning the authorship of the Gospel of John.
If the author of the Gospel of John were an eyewitness, presumably the author would have known that Jesus and his compatriots were permitted to enter the synagogues.
With so much talk lately about the Gospels, I wonder, who wrote the Gospels and how do we know?
To answer this question we must first be clear on how the Gospels were formed and what constitutes authorship. The foundational premise is that "Holy Mother Church has firmly and with absolute constancy maintained and continues to maintain, that the four Gospels [Matthew, Mark, Luke and John], whose historicity she unhesitatingly affirms, faithfully hand on what Jesus, the Son of God, while He lived among men, really did and taught for their eternal salvation until the day when He was taken up." Arlington Catholic Herald Diocese of Arlington, May 18, 2006 With so much talk lately about the Gospels, I wonder, who wrote the Gospels and how do we know?
It is worth noting for its own sake, even though the "beloved disciple" need not be identified with John, the son of Zebedee.great many of Paul's letters." These observations are set out in the Introduction to the Ecumenical Translation of the Bible, New Testament (Introduction la Traduction oecumnique de la Bible, Nouveau Testament) edited 1972 .They are worth mentioning from the outset, and it is useful to point out here that the work referred to is the result of a collective effort which brought together more than one hundred Catholic and Protestant specialists. canonic, did not become known until fairly late, even though they were completed at the beginning of the Second century A. According to the Ecumenical Translation, stories belonging to them began to be quoted around the middle of the Second century A. Nevertheless, "it is nearly always difficult to decide whether the quotations come from written texts that the authors had next to them or if the latter were content to evoke the memory of fragments of the oral tradition.""Before 140 A.To review properly such an enormous and effective endeavor could in itself constitute the pursuit of a lifetime.Having said that - somewhat in jest - I have nonetheless put pen to paper to provide a proper analysis of a worthy effort. Price is one of the leading luminaries in New Testament studies, bringing with him not only an impressive amount of erudition but also a fresh perspective of an old and festering dilemma, which is the probable condition of the New Testament prior to the First Council of Nicene in 325 AD/CE.
Search for dating the writing of the gospels:
Indeed, in between Price's impressive translations of these texts, as well as in the footnotes, appear nuggets of material that help fill out the overall thesis of the work: To wit, the pre-Nicene New Testament essentially originated with Marcion, as was related in ancient times.